Home/ Compare/ TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4) vs IGF-1 LR3

TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4) vs. IGF-1 LR3 for Athletes

Both anabolic/recovery; IGF-1 LR3 for muscle, TB-500 for systemic repair.

TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4)

Recovery & Repair

Athletic Use Cases

Systemic Tissue RepairMuscle Fiber RecoveryFlexibility & MobilityChronic Injury Management

Dose

2mg - 5mg

Frequency

2x weekly (loading), 1x weekly (maintenance)

WADA Banned

Full TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4) Profile

IGF-1 LR3

Muscle & Anabolism

Athletic Use Cases

Muscle HyperplasiaSatellite Cell ActivationNutrient PartitioningAnabolic Signaling

Dose

20mcg - 50mcg

Frequency

Daily or post-workout

WADA Banned

Full IGF-1 LR3 Profile

Which Should Athletes Choose?

The choice between TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4) and IGF-1 LR3 depends primarily on the athlete's specific training phase and injury profile. TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4) is best suited for systemic tissue regeneration, flexibility support, and wound healing., while IGF-1 LR3 excels at enhanced anabolic effects and muscle growth with extended half-life..

From a WADA compliance perspective, athletes competing in tested sports must note that TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4) is Banned and IGF-1 LR3 is Banned. Always verify current status with your sport's governing body.

Physician-Supervised Performance

Start Your Performance Protocol for TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4) or IGF-1 LR3

Hatter Labs provides physician-supervised performance protocols with GMP-certified compounds, biomarker testing, and personalized programs designed around your training goals.

Get a Physician Consultation View All Compounds

HIPAA Compliant · GMP Certified · Physician Supervised